This blog post has been sitting in my drafts for minimum 3 months so I figured it was time I finished it. I decided to go in a completely different direction and have the discussion of nature vs. nurture. Now this is something I find so fascinating because 1. the human psyche is profound and ever changing, and 2. I love serial killers/mass murders and I love studying what brought their acts to fruition. Even outside of the realm of my obsession, the discussion of nature vs. nurture has been going on since ancient times, going back to Aristotle. This debate of whether we are born and everything we do and become is inherent, passed down in our genes, or are we a blank canvas, molded and shaped by our surroundings, meaning our parents, our peers, our society, etc. So because I’m a weirdo, I’m gonna use the serial killer approach because its the perfect cesspool of humans for this discussion. And don’t worry, I’m gonna stick to the famous ones everyone (most everyone) knows.
But first, I want to talk about the start of my fascination for this topic. In the 8th grade we had to read Lord of the Flies, which I would highly recommend if you havent, but brief synopsis: a group of boys get stranded on an island and you slowly watch the humanity fade from them and watch them become increasingly violent and animalistic towards each other. You watch them choose sides and adopt this kill or be killed mentality. So we had to write a paper on if we thought human beings are inherently “bad/evil”, if this is something we learn, or if it’s something we adapt to. Maybe it was my Christian upbringing, but I immediately went with “yes we are naturally bad,” because that’s what the bible teaches. However, outside of thatm when we are stripped down to our most basic animal instincts, I believe we will do whatever it takes to survive even if that means hurting someone else. Now, most of us are never put in a situation like that to where we would hurt someone, but how often do we laugh at others pain or take joy in other’s despair? Minute as it may seem, we’ve all caused someone pain and gotten pleasure out of it. Not to say we are all on the brink of murder, but I believe there is something in our very nature that fights for superiority over others whether that is with work, our relationships, etc. So moving right along, let’s get into the nitty gritty.
Nature: Ted Bundy. Now for those that don’t know good ol’ Ted Bundy, he was a serial killer that abducted, raped, and murdered 30 (confessed to) woman during the 70s. If you read up on this guy, it’s really astounding he wasnt caught earlier and he actually escaped prison twice so you could say he was a pretty bright guy. He actually led a very normal life. He had girlfriends and jobs and everyone seemed to like him. This man was the king of rouses. So what made him “become” a murder because this isn’t something you just go to in an instant? Now granted, he started with rape first and then escalated to murder, but he didn’t need to rape woman. He was actually a decent looking guy who had normal relationships. It wasn’t like he couldn’t get laid. If you listen to or read interviews with his family they will say for the most part he was a very normal child. He had a loving home and there was no abuse that we know of and even Bundy said he wasn’t abused. His mom or grandmother (I can’t remember which one) said that one day they had woken up from a nap and Ted had placed knives all around her body and he was only like 5 or 6. Not that those actions mark him for life but still it is odd. Ted will say his actions were a result of watching pornography and being addicted to it, but I don’t buy it 100%. Being addicted to porn, I can understand because that is a real thing, but that addiction leading to the murder of at least 30 women, nope. Hell, 120 million people visit Pornhub on the daily and pretty sure 99% of those people aren’t rapist. If you watch his interviews prior to being convicted, this was a man who very much thought there was no way he was going to jail. He was going to do whatever it took to get out of the punishment, which is a big reason he came out with the porn addiction defense because he thought getting Christianity on his side would suspend the death penalty. So was this inevitable for Bundy? Was this an evil that he was born with inside him?
Nurture: This is a deep pool that you could get lost in for hours because time after time, child abuse and parental relationships is a critical factor for most of these serial killers. As well as environment and era. Now there are plenty of people that are abused and they aren’t out there brutally murdering people but if you look at a lot of serial killers they are the perfect storm of terrible circumstances. For example, John Wayne Gacy. Gacy was born into a family with an alcoholic father who regularly beat his wife and children. His father constantly tormented him because he had a heart defect so he wasn’t as active and couldn’t be in sports. One large factor of self hate in Gacy’s life was his sexuality. You have to put into context that this was the 1950s and 1960s. That was a big no no. This was the peak of homosexuality being viewed as a mental illness and full of perverts and men that wanted to rape your children. I’m now realizing that Gacy legit filled all the stereotypes people had of the gays during that time. Anyway, living with a father that really hated the homosexual community and I’m sure burned that into John’s mind on a regular basis, John had to hide his sexuality. He would try to have a normal life, get married, have children, and be very involved in his community. He dressed up as a clown for birthday parties for goodness sake. Everyone knew John and he had a pretty good reputation. There’s a lot of speculation around Gacy’s murder confession because he’s changed stories a few times, but the first murder he described as self defense. So let’s say this first murder was self defense, the kid did try to attack him, what made him go on to rape and kill 33 teen boys? Personally, I think inside his twisted brain, he thought that if he killed them then it served to fill that homosexuality hate that had been instilled in him because he didnt have a problem getting male prostitutes. He was able to have “consensual” sex with most of these teens, but I think the hate that had been sowed into him by his father was a big driving force for the anger he felt which eventually bloomed into violence and murder.
With both Gacy and Bundy both there is also a conditioning aspect. With both of these men, at some point they were okay with semi consensual sex, but whenever you condition your body to associate climaxing with something like murder, the violent act then becomes necessary in your routine to obtain sexual gratification. They both, in a sense, nurtured their destructive tendencies, but where those tendencies were born, is definitely up for discussion. Hopefully this dark and twisty path wasnt too rough for y’all. I definitely toned it down a bit because a lot of Bundy and Gacy’s crimes were super violent and not easy to stomach. I wish I had an answer for this debate, but arguments can be made for both sides as well as a mix of the two.